By Mortz C. Ortigoza
After my recent radio program where I discussed President Rod Duterte threatened Supreme Court Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno that he will
declare martial law unless the chief magistrate stop foisting a constitutional
crisis, some members of social media Face Book’s community page react to my
opinion where I said that Duterte can declare military rule with the high court
helpless for it.
CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS. President Rodrigo Duterte and Supreme Court Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno. PHOTO CREDIT: RAPPLER.COM |
One of them said that the president could not just
declare martial law because it is limited by the Constitution where the Supreme
Court can declare if the imposition of martial law is unconstitutional.
“You read Section 18 of Article VII (Executive Department)
paulit-ulit para hinde ka mag mukhang tanga , “ the angry reader pointed.
My retort: The problem with many Filipinos like you is
you think “inside the box”, er, you focused only on Section 18, e kung hindi
susundin ni Duterte ang Section 18 at gayahin niya si Cory Aquino where the
1973 Constitution became passe’ in favour of the 1987 Constitution?
I explained to those who were affronted there: “You did not see that Duterte can declare martial law without following the
limitations mandated by the Constitution.
The limitations say that a president after declaring
military rule should “ Within
forty-eight hours from the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, the President shall submit a report in
person or in writing to the Congress. The Congress, voting jointly, by a vote
of at least a majority of all its Members in regular or special session, may
revoke such proclamation or suspension, which revocation shall not be set aside
by the President. Upon the initiative of the President, the Congress may, in
the same manner, extend such proclamation or suspension for a period to be
determined by the Congress, if the invasion or rebellion shall persist and
public safety requires it. The Congress, if not in session, shall, within
twenty-four hours following such proclamation or suspension, convene in
accordance with its rules without any need of a call” WHILE the Supreme
Court “may review, in an appropriate
proceeding filed by any citizen, the sufficiency of the factual basis of the
proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the privilege of the writ or
the extension thereof, and must promulgate its decision thereon within thirty
days from its filing”.
The safety clauses there to prevent a strong man to be successful in his desire to impose his will are:
1) Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at least a majority of all its Members in regular or special session, may revoke such proclamation of martial law or suspension of writ of habeas corpus;
2) Supreme Court promulgate its decision thereon within thirty days from the filing of a petition by a citizen if martial law is legal or illegal.
The safety clauses there to prevent a strong man to be successful in his desire to impose his will are:
1) Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at least a majority of all its Members in regular or special session, may revoke such proclamation of martial law or suspension of writ of habeas corpus;
2) Supreme Court promulgate its decision thereon within thirty days from the filing of a petition by a citizen if martial law is legal or illegal.
I added that since Duterte has been riding on the crest
of 84 percent popularity among the Filipinos as based on the June 24 to 27
Social Weather Station’s survey, he can skirt those protective clauses put by the
handpicked constitutional commissioners of then President Cory Aquino during
her Revolutionary Government after flushing –out Marcos in a military takeover and
emulate Cory Aquino by appointing commissioner, too, to hammer a new
fundamental law and submit it for plebiscite to the Filipino voters who would
surely vote for it because they highly trusted the intention of the president
for this sorry country.
With a palatable federal government that the new premier
law would put in various regions all over the country, with 100 percent foreign
ownership as one of the provisions of the Constitution to spike more jobs among
the Filipinos, other new laws, the
voters would surely vote for the new Constitution.
What will happen to the 1987 Constitution? Son of a gun, just like the Ferdinand Marcos’ 1973 Constitution, it would go kaput or passé’, too!
That’s thinking outside the box my dear Procopio!
(You can read my selected columns at
http://mortzortigoza.blogspot.com and articles at Pangasinan News Aro. You can
send comments too at totomortz@yahoo.com)
MY COLUMN IN AUGUST 2016: "The problem with many Filipinos like you is you think “inside the box”, er, you focused only on Section 18, e kung hindi susundin ni Duterte ang Section 18 at gayahin niya si Cory Aquino where the 1973 Constitution became passe’ in favour of the 1987 Constitution?
TumugonBurahinI explained to those who were affronted there: “You did not see that Duterte can declare martial law without following the limitations mandated by the Constitution"
PRESIDENT DUTERTE YESTERDAY (January 14, 2017) who just justified the declaration of Martial Law just like what I opined on August last year, sannamagan! :
Are you in need of a loan? Do you want to pay off your bills? Do you want to be financially stable? All you have to do is to contact us for more information on how to get started and get the loan you desire. This offer is open to all that will be able to repay back in due time. Note-that repayment time frame is negotiable and at interest rate of 3% just email us (creditloan11@gmail.com)
TumugonBurahin